菲利普·罗斯访谈

5月18日澳大利亚悉尼的作家大会上,曼布克评委会宣布美国作家菲利普·罗斯获得了第四届曼布克国际奖。曼布克国际奖是对作家一生成就的褒奖。也就是说,这个奖项是对罗斯50多年的创作生涯和成就的认可和赞扬。5月20日,罗斯接受了《电讯报》(The Telegraph)记者本杰明·泰勒(Benjamin Taylor)的专访。以下是专访的部分文字稿。《电讯报》原文配有相对完整的访谈视频。感兴趣者可以点击阅读原文,观看视频

Philip Roth: I’m not caged in by reality

Benjamin Taylor Were you one of those people who knew from childhood that you wanted to be a writer?

Philip Roth I didn’t know what a writer was, but I knew what books were because I would go to the Blanche library in our neighbourhood [of Newark, New Jersey], following the example of my brother, who would come home with half a dozen books. They were kids’ books, books about sports, books about the sea. I learnt what an author was in college. I began to read in my second year. I had entered college thinking I would study law. And I assumed I would do that. I was taking constitutional history, political science. Then I discovered literature and I was overcome. I wrote college stories to start with, which were as weak as anyone’s college stories. A few years later I was drafted and went into the army. At night when I went back to my office job I started writing stories that were OK. So [becoming a writer] wasn’t something I knew about and even when I did do it I never thought about it that much. Even when I started writing properly, I didn’t think I would make a living. Very few did make a living, and very few make a living now. I thought I needed to get a job, so I decided to teach English so I could write for those four or five months in the summer. That was my plan. Then I won a prize, the National Book award, and got a Guggenheim Award and then I was on easy street.

BT How was your stint in the army?

PR Actually I didn’t mind it. It’s fun to learn how to shoot a machine gun. Or use a bayonet. I hurt my back and wound up in hospital for two months and then eventually got discharged. My back still troubles me off and on. It might have been interesting had I been [in the army] longer. But that stint was enough. I got the idea.

BT When did history as a theme come into your writing?

PR I suppose in the mid-Eighties when I wrote The Counterlife. I don’t know what happened. It’s not so much that history was important, but place became important. I wanted to see what people were like in different places. London for one, Israel for another, Prague for a third. So place entered in and history came after. Why? Because I had gotten to be 50 or 60 and I could now look back on my life with historical perspective. You can’t do that when you’re young. It’s a mixture, then, of getting older and being enlivened by certain places that I’d been to.

BT When did you take up these themes of recent books: the Korean war, in 2008’s Indignation; or the perils of polio, in last year’s Nemesis? Do you do a lot of research or are you simply remembering?

PR I do my remembering while I’m writing. I don’t usually turn to the books until I’ve got a first draft of my story. I don’t want to be caged in by reality, as it were. I want my imagination to go wherever it wants to go. If it’s outlandish then of course I’ll get rid of it. Then, two or three drafts in, I begin to read books. Take The Plot Against America (2004): there’s a cousin in the book, I can’t remember his name, and he loses a leg in the war. He sleeps in a room with young Philip and he has a stump. So I found someone with a stump and I talked to him about how he got on living with it. He let me touch it, which was amazing. I walked on his crutches. He was a terrific fella. You may not use what the person says to you, but it stimulates you in the right direction. It launches your imagination. Or when I wrote about a kosher butcher in one of my books, Indignation, you’d think it would be easier not to consult books! But I did, I found interesting books about kosher meat. I also went to a kosher butcher in Brooklyn, went in and walked around and talked to the guys. I had been to them as a kid but I didn’t remember what it smelled like.

BT Some of the historical books have brought you poignant letters, from readers enmeshed in the events, on subjects like polio or the Korean war and so on…

PR The best come from people who want to discuss the subject of the book. And very often they have lived in a similar milieu or been through a similar hardship. Most recently, because of the publication of Nemesis [set during the Newark polio outbreak of 1944], I had gotten three or four or five or six letters from polio victims. All from men about my age because polio stopped with vaccinations of people in 1955 in America. These guys had got polio before that, as youngsters. And they’re so heartfelt and so descriptive, they made me feel validated in what I wrote.

BT Nemesis is the most recent in a series of four short novels. Can you say something about them?

PR About 10 years ago, I began to think about short novels. I had read quite a few. Saul Bellow was alive then and Saul had written three or four interesting short novels near the end of his life and I asked him how he did it. And he did what Saul [usually] did – he laughed. So I started to [write one]. It’s strange. With short stories, you’re fighting with one hand behind your back. How do you get the punch, the knock-out punch, in a short book? I had to find out. Maybe I found out. Maybe I didn’t.

BT Which writers in particular shaped you?

PR There are some writers who have made an indelible impression. I don’t know if they shaped me as a writer, but they shaped me as a thinker and a reader and as a literary person. When I first started out, at school, I had been steeped in Henry James and there was an “influence”, not all for the good, and there was a tone I picked up from James, that didn’t suit me at all. But it’s there in Letting Go (1962).

Kafka made a strong impression on me. His serious comedies of guilt touched me. I think Bellow, of course, has been a major figure in my mind and imagination all my life as a writer. Saul was born in 1915, so he’s 18 years older than me. Therefore he was a figure of awe for me. When I got to Chicago in 1955 to go to grad school and I read Augie March, it was my guidebook to the city. It all seemed so glamorous to me, to be in the city that nourishes the sky. I read Bellow’s books as soon as they came out.

BT Has the theatre every tempted you as it tempted writers like Henry James?

PR In the middle Sixties the Ford Foundation had a programme to try to interest novelists and poets to write plays. I got a grant from them to try to write a play. No one has written worse plays than me. Maybe Henry James. I couldn’t figure it out. Maybe there is no way to figure it out. Maybe that’s why there are very few good plays. But I couldn’t figure it out. I couldn’t get anything that resembled my mind into the plays. I did that for two or three years and it didn’t work.

BT Among your exact contemporaries was John Updike, whose career runs alongside yours. You won the National Book award; he won the Rosenfeld award. You were often contrasted.

PR John has been dead for three years. And I slightly suspect that were he alive he would be sitting here in this chair [picking up the International Booker Prize], not me. He was a great American master, surely the greatest man of letters of his period in the second half of the 20th century. He was a brilliant writer. He could write any kind sentence imaginable. You just asked and he would give it to you. His two great books to my mind, although he wrote quite a few great books, are the last two Rabbit books: Rabbit is Rich and Rabbit at Rest. He is free as a bird. He can go anywhere. He can do any kind of comedy. Any kind of description. He was always free but in those two books he is the freest he’ll ever be

非凡的读者:哈罗德·布罗姆

著作等身(经他一人之手的各种学术著作40余部)、集无数荣誉于一身的文学研究专家哈罗德·布罗姆(Harold Bloom)已经80高龄了。耄耋之年的布罗姆老人在推新作《影响的解剖:文学是一种生活方式》(The Anatomy of Influence: Literature as a Way Life)。这是老人意在概括其一生的文学研究理念、纵横畅论文学精粹的鸿篇巨著。正如老人本人所言,这是他最后的天鹅之歌(virtual swan song)。所以这部作品肯定是文学研究者的必读书之一。

虽然我说得热闹,其实我只是看到了《纽约时报》上的一篇书评而已。这篇书评一方面简要概括了布罗姆先生研究生涯,同时扼要简介了布罗姆新书中的一些主要观点。有兴趣者,也可以点击后面这个文章标题来看看:“Harold Bloom:An Uncommon Reader”。

罗斯获颁布克国际奖

5月18日,在澳大利亚悉尼作家大会的新闻发布会上,布克国际文学奖评审委员会宣布美国作家菲利普·罗斯获得了第四届布克国际文学奖。正如评委会主席里克·格科斯基所言:“五十多年来,菲利普·罗斯的书一直在刺激着读者的兴趣、激发着读者的思考、愉悦着读者的生活。这是一个庞大的读者群,而且还在不断扩大”。正式的颁奖仪式将于6月28日在伦敦举行。奖金是6万英镑。

布克国际文学奖每两年颁发一次。此前的三次分别颁给了伊斯迈尔·卡戴尔(Ismail Kadare,2005)、奇努阿·阿切贝(Chinua Achebe,2007)和爱丽丝·门罗(Alice Munro,2009)。

以下资料来自BBC NEWS:

Philip Roth wins the Man Booker International Prize

Philip Roth has been described as one of the most prolific and controversial writers in the world

US writer Philip Roth has been announced as the winner of the fourth Man Booker International Prize.

The award and £60,000 prize money is presented to a writer for their “achievement in fiction on the world stage”, organisers said.

Roth, 78, said: “This is a great honour and I’m delighted to receive it.”

His body of work includes the 1997 novel American Pastoral, for which he received the Pulitzer Prize. At 26, he wrote his first book Goodbye, Columbus.

‘Esteemed prize’

The announcement was made at a press conference in Australia, during the Sydney Writers’ Festival.

The award will be presented at a formal dinner in London on 28 June, however a spokeswoman said Roth would be unable to attend.

Born in Newark, New Jersey in 1933, Roth’s controversial 1969 novel Portnoy’s Complaint brought him worldwide attention for its graphic depiction of sexuality.

Time magazine included the work in a list of the best novels of the 20th century.

His 2000 book The Human Stain was adapted for the screen, starring Sir Anthony Hopkins and Oscar-winner Nicole Kidman.

The American author said he was grateful to the judges for awarding him the “esteemed prize”.

He added: “One of the particular pleasures I’ve had as a writer is to have my work read internationally despite all the heartaches of translation that that entails.

“I hope the prize will bring me to the attention of readers around the world who are not familiar with my work. This is a great honour and I’m delighted to receive it.”

The judging panel was chaired by writer, academic and rare-book dealer Dr Rick Gekoski.

“For more than 50 years Philip Roth’s books have stimulated, provoked and amused an enormous, and still expanding, audience,” he said.

“His imagination has not only recast our idea of Jewish identity, it has also reanimated fiction, and not just American fiction, generally.”

Gekoski was joined on the panel by writer and critic Carmen Callil and award-winning novelist Justin Cartwright.

In March British thriller writer John Le Carre asked judges to withdraw his name from the shortlist.

The author said he was “enormously flattered” but added: “I do not compete for literary prizes.”

His Dark Materials author Philip Pullman and Rohinton Mistry had also been up for the award.

The Man Booker International Prize, which is presented every two years, has previously been awarded to Ismail Kadare in 2005, Chinua Achebe in 2007 and Alice Munro in 2009.

精美GIF图欣赏

网络上的gif图很多。大多是些幽默搞笑的,或者是一些偶发事件的片段。最近看到一些非常唯美的gif图,其动静之处会让你的内心仿佛被轻轻拂动一般。很精致、很美妙的感觉。选几幅在这里与您共赏。【标题是我擅自添加的。也许不很合适。请多担待】

醇香无尽

心的荡漾

风轻意重

闹中取静

【以上这些都来源于“From Me to You.” 大家可以点击进入。一定会有很多惊喜发现。】

【转载】有关拉登的书籍盘点

从9·11至今,有关本拉登及其基地组织的书籍不断出现。现在,拉登终于被美国干掉了。不过,有关他的书籍估计还会层出不穷~~~

May 2, 2011, 3:15 pm

A Survey of Books About Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda

By MICHIKO KAKUTANI

Since 9/11, there has been an outpouring of books about Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda, the Sept. 11 attacks and the war in Afghanistan. Below is an annotated list of some of the more useful ones.
Some of these books are primarily concerned with giving the reader a bildungsroman-like account of Bin Laden’s transformation into a charismatic leader from a callow young man who “couldn’t lead eight ducks across the street,” as Prince Bandar, the former Saudi ambassador in Washington, once said. They underscore the unresolved Oedipal problems (not unlike those of George W. Bush) that he had with his powerful and wealthy father, while exploring the role that older mentors played in his growing radicalization.

“The Bin Ladens,” by Steve Coll, also adds new details to our understanding of how the young Bin Laden evolved from a loyal family adjutant into an angry black sheep lashing out at some of the very connections his father and brothers had cultivated in their business dealings for years.

An earlier book by Mr. Coll, “Ghost Wars” (2004), traveled back in time to explore the role the C.I.A. played in the anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan in the 1980s, and how America’s abandonment of that country after the Soviet withdrawal left behind a chaotic land with heavily armed, feuding warlords: conditions that created a perfect environment for the rise of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Jonathan Randal’s “Osama” and Michael Scheuer’s “Osama bin Laden” also examine America’s unwittingly role in the ascendance of these radical groups.

As for the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, most of these books agree that it was a terrible misstep that played into Bin Laden’s hands, fueling Qaeda recruitment efforts and diverting critical military and intelligence resources away from Afghanistan, which in turn led to the resurgence there of the Taliban. Peter L. Bergen’s new book, “The Longest War,” provides a devastating indictment of the Bush administration on many levels, from its failure to heed warnings about a terrorist threat, to its determination to conduct the war in Afghanistan on the cheap, to its costly, unnecessary and inept occupation of Iraq.

Both “The Longest War” and Lawrence Wright’s “Looming Tower” give readers a visceral sense of what day-to-day life was like in Qaeda training camps. Mr. Wright, noting that Bin Laden was not opposed to the United States because of its culture or ideas but because of its political and military actions in the Islamic world, observes that Qaeda trainees often watched Hollywood thrillers at night (Arnold Schwarzenegger movies were particular favorites) in an effort to gather tactical tips.

Mr. Bergen, for his part, observes that Al Qaeda became a highly bureaucratic organization with bylaws dealing with matters like salary levels, furniture allowances and vacation schedules.
“The Looming Tower” and “The Bin Ladens,” among other books, suggest that Bin Laden’s turn to war against the United States was not inevitable: bad luck, events in his life, politics in Saudi Arabia and neighboring countries, decisions made by the United States government and absurd turf wars between the C.I.A. and F.B.I. all contributed to Al Qaeda’s pulling off the Sept. 11 attacks. During the period when he was living in the Sudan, Mr. Wright says, Bin Laden “was wavering — the lure of peace being as strong as the battle cry of jihad”: agriculture “captivated his imagination,” and he reportedly told friends he was thinking of quitting Al Qaeda and becoming a farmer. The continuing presence of American troops in Saudi Arabia (after the first gulf war), however, angered Bin Laden, and the movement of American troops into Somalia in √1992 (on a humanitarian relief mission) made Al Qaeda feel increasingly encircled. In meetings held at the end of 1992, Mr. Wright says, the group “turned from being the anti-Communist Islamic army that Bin Laden originally envisioned into a terrorist organization bent on attacking the United States.”

THE LONGEST WAR: The Enduring Conflict Between America and Al-Qaeda (2011). By Peter L. Bergen. This volume by CNN’s national security analyst provides a succinct overview of the war on terror, giving the reader a sharply observed portrait of Bin Laden, whom Mr. Bergen interviewed in 1997, and an intimate understanding of how the organization operates on a day-to-day basis. Mr. Bergen argues that Bin Laden over-reached with the 9/11 attacks and that Al Qaeda has a growing list of enemies including Muslims who don’t share its “ultra-fundamentalist worldview.” The book also provides a harrowing account of Bin Laden’s escape from American forces at Tora Bora in December 2001, after the C.I.A.’s request for more troops was turned down by the Pentagon.

OSAMA: The Making of a Terrorist (2004). By Jonathan Randal. This book by a former Washington Post correspondent is less a biography of Al Qaeda’s mastermind than a history of the contemporary jihadi movement, which Mr. Randal argues was inadvertently strengthened by American hubris, ignorance and missteps in the Middle East and Persian Gulf. Mr. Randal chronicles Bin Laden’s combat experiences as an anti-Soviet jihadi, his growing radicalization and the role that various mentors and surrogate father figures played in his evolution.

THE BIN LADENS: An Arabian Family in the American Century (2008). By Steve Coll. In this family epic, Mr. Coll, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author, creates a psychologically detailed portrait of Bin Laden and his relationships with his father, Muhammad, who made a fortune in Saudi Arabia as the king’s principal builder; and his older brother Salem, a British-educated, music-loving playboy, who used to organize family expeditions to Las Vegas. Mr. Coll suggests that Bin Laden’s turn to war against the United States was not inevitable, but the result of many factors. Those included his worsening relationships with the Saudi royal family and his own relatives as well as growing anger at America, which had pressured the government of Sudan to expel him from the country (where he raised horses and sunflowers on a farm while training jihadis) and send him into exile in Afghanistan in 1996.

HOLY WAR, INC.: Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden (2001). By Peter L. Bergen. In an early study of Al Qaeda, this CNN analyst emphasizes the crucial role that the Afghan-Soviet conflict played in radicalizing many Islamic militants in the 1980s, giving fighters like Bin Laden the confidence that they could defeat a superpower and replacing the notion of Arab nationalism with that of a larger Islamist movement. Mr. Bergen argues here that Bin Laden’s anger at the United States has little to do with Western culture — say, movies or drug and alcohol use — but rather stems from American policies in the Middle East, namely “the continued U.S. military presence in Arabia; U.S. support for Israel; its continued bombing of Iraq; and its support for regimes such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia that bin Laden regards as apostates from Islam.”

OSAMA BIN LADEN (2011). By Michael Scheuer. Mr. Scheuer, who once headed the C.I.A.’s Osama bin Laden unit, dissects the puritanical religious views that informed Bin Laden’s thinking. As he did in earlier books like “Imperial Hubris,” Mr. Scheuer contends that Bin Laden was not an irrational terrorist, but a shrewd strategist and tactician who wanted to lure the United States into a financially draining quagmire in the Middle East. He regards the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 as a recruiting bonanza for Al Qaeda and a great gift for Bin Laden.

THE LOOMING TOWER: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 (2006). By Lawrence Wright. Based on more than 500 interviews, this book gives readers a searing view of the events of Sept. 11, 2001, and how that tragic day came about. Mr. Wright, a writer for The New Yorker, suggests that the emergence of Al Qaeda “depended on a unique conjunction of personalities” — that is, Bin Laden, whose global vision and charismatic leadership would hold together the organization; and his deputy Ayman al-Zawahri, who promoted the apocalyptic idea that only violence could change history. In Mr. Wright’s account, we see how a shy young Osama bin Laden, who loved the American television series “Bonanza,” became a solemn religious adolescent, and how under the Machiavellian tutelage of Mr. Zawahri, he grew increasingly radicalized.

IN THE GRAVEYARD OF EMPIRES: America’s War in Afghanistan (2009). By Seth G. Jones. This book by an adjunct professor at Georgetown University charts several decades of relations between the United States and Afghanistan, focusing on what went awry after America’s successful routing of the Taliban in late 2001. Mr. Jones blames the invasion of Iraq for diverting resources and attention from the war in Afghanistan, and notes that as the situation deteriorated, there was a spillover effect in Pakistan, which offered a haven to many Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters. Among Mr. Jones’s conclusions is that the United States must “persuade Pakistani military and civilian leaders to conduct a sustained campaign against militants mounting attacks in Afghanistan and the region” and threatening the foundations of “the nuclear-armed Pakistani state.”

GHOST WARS: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and bin Laden, From the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001 (2004). By Steve Coll. Mapping the long, mistake-filled road to 9/11, this book examines the C.I.A.’s covert role during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s and America’s later neglect of the country during the post-cold war ’90s, when the Taliban and Al Qaeda took advantage of the political vacuum. Mr. Coll chronicles the failures of both the Clinton and Bush administrations to mount a serious attack on Al Qaeda and to implement a coherent counterterrorism strategy.